You are here:
cosmetics
Opinion
(9)FAQs
(9)Press releases
(6)Date | Title | Keywords |
---|---|---|
20.07.2020 24/2020
|
Aluminium in antiperspirants: Low contribution to the total intake of aluminium in humans | |
28.05.2020 17/2020
|
Sun cream protects, but are there health risks? | |
18.11.2019 45/2019
|
Reducing aluminium intake can minimise potential health risks | |
27.08.2019 33/2019
|
Allergy risk: Metal particles from tattoo needles detected in the skin for the first time | |
17.10.2018 32/2018
|
From antiperspirants containing aluminium to zinc salts in toothpaste: 50 years of the Cosmetics Committee | |
13.08.2015 21/2015
|
Tattoos: even parting with them is not without risks |
Communication
(6)Date | Title | Size |
---|---|---|
21.09.2023 Communication No. 040/2023
|
Deodorant challenge: abuse can seriously damage health |
638.1 KB |
09.11.2022 Communication No 031/2022 of the BfR
|
Toxicological testing requirements to be developed: 3rd Expert discussion at the BfR on tattoo inks |
90.3 KB |
08.11.2022 Communication No 030/2022 of the BfR
|
Operable minimum toxicological requirements: 2nd Expert discussion at BfR on tattoo inks |
134.9 KB |
13.10.2022 Communication No 024/2022 from the BfR
|
Self-experiment: Body can absorb fluorine-containing chemical PFOA through the skin |
97.6 KB |
16.06.2022 BfR Communication No. 014/2022
|
Necessary specifications of tattoo ink ingredients: Expert discussion at the BfR |
256.0 KB |
13.12.2019 BfR Communication No 049/2019
|
How much aluminium passes through the skin? The BfR reviews a new expert opinion |
134.1 KB |